- Fueling higher oil prices this year — and counter to market expectations — is a drop in oil inventories since 2015, amid rising demand
- As a result, energy stock valuations are more attractive than they were three years ago
- Energy companies have implemented capital discipline to improve cash flows
For the past three years, market observers have been concerned about accelerating oil inventories, which put downward pressure on prices. However, inventories have been drawing down rapidly, especially in the past year.
In addition, demand growth has surprised on the upside since 2015. The impact of underinvestment by energy companies for the past several years, combined with improved global economic growth, has provided a healthy supply/demand balance in the energy sector.
Current oil prices appear sustainable My view is that oil prices above $60, or even $70, per barrel could be sustained for much longer than current expectations. I don’t believe it requires accelerated economic growth, or even maintaining the current level of growth, to keep the market relatively tight and to keep prices in the $60–$70 range.
Better capital discipline has improved energy companies fundamentally Compared with three years ago, oil fundamentals are in a much stronger place and energy stock valuations are more attractive today, in our view. Integrated oil companies, in particular, as well as Canadian oil sands producers are leveraged to an improving macroeconomic environment, we believe. We also favor exploration and production companies with low-cost U.S. shale acreage, as we believe these stocks can outperform in a variety of scenarios for oil prices.
For many companies, free-cash flow is back to its highest levels since the start of the last upswing in 2005–2006. This is the result of solid capital discipline — lower investment levels as a percentage of operating cash flow, which I believe will continue for a much longer period than the market expects. I recall conversations with CFOs from five years ago, when energy companies were investing billions in new projects. Since then, their mindsets and corporate strategies have been re-set to a much more conservative stance. I believe this is a healthier environment that should help to prolong the duration of this upcycle.
In contrast, Venezuela shows poor capital discipline Lack of investment has led to lower production in several countries, but Venezuela is the most extreme example. At the midpoint of 2018, Venezuelan oil production had crashed to a new 30-year low of 1.5 million barrels a day.
According to figures from OPEC and Standard & Poor’s, Venezuela lost approximately 1 million barrels per day over the past two years. The collapse is due largely to lack of investment and maintenance by Venezuela’s oil company, PDVSA.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.